Site Search:
Advanced Search
Posted: 12/26/2008 - 4 comment(s) [ Comment ] - 0 trackback(s) [ Trackback ]
Category: Politics

The article below is the clearest "bottom line" description of liberalism's America juxtaposed with Conservativism's America that I have come across to date.

This article deals with principles and is therefore ageless.

alt

by Dennis Prager
Tuesday, October 14, 2008

It is time to confront the unhappy fact about our country:

There are now two Americas. Not a rich one and  a poor

one; economic status plays little role in this division.

 

There is a red one and a blue one.

 

For most of my life I have believed, in what I now regard as wishful thinking, that the right and left wings have essentially the same vision for America, that it's only about ways to get there in which the two sides differ. Right and left share the same ends, I thought.

 

That is not the case. For the most part, right and left differ in their visions of America and that is why they differ on policies.

 

Right and the left do not want the same America.

 

The left wants America to look as much like Western European countries as possible. The left wants Europe's quasi-pacifism, cradle-to-grave socialism, egalitarianism and secularism in America. The right wants none of those values to dominate America.

 

The left wants America not only to have a secular government, but to have a secular society. The left feels that if people want to be religious, they should do so at home and in their houses of prayer, but never try to inject their religious values into society. The right wants America to continue to be what it has always been -- a Judeo-Christian society with a largely secular government (that is not indifferent to religion). These opposing visions explain, for example, their opposite views concerning nondenominational prayer in school.

 

The left prefers to identify as citizens of the world. The left fears nationalism in general (this has been true for the European left since World War I), and since the 1960s, the American left has come to fear American nationalism in particular. On the other side, the right identifies first as citizens of America.

The left therefore regards the notion of American exceptionalism as chauvinism; the United Nations and world opinion are regarded as better arbiters of what is good than is America. The right has a low opinion of the U.N.'s moral compass and of world opinion, both of which it sees as having a much poorer record of stopping genocide and other evils than America has.

 

The left is ambivalent about and often hostile to overt displays of American patriotism. That is why, for example, one is far more likely to find American flags displayed in Orange County, Calif., on national holidays than in liberal neighborhoods in West Los Angeles, Manhattan or San Francisco.

 

The left subscribes to the French Revolution, whose guiding principles were "Liberty, Equality, Fraternity." The right subscribes to the American formula, "Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness." The French/European notion of equality is not mentioned. The right rejects the French Revolution and does not hold Western Europe as a model. The left does. That alone makes right and left irreconcilable.

 

The left envisions an egalitarian society. The right does not. The left values equality above other values because it yearns for an America in which all people have similar amounts of material possessions. This is what propels the left to advocate laws that would force employers to pay women the same wages they pay men not only for the same job but for "comparable" jobs (as if that is objectively ascertainable). The right values equality in opportunity and strongly believes that all people are created equal, but the right values liberty, a man-woman based family and other values above equality.

 

The left wants a world -- and therefore an America -- devoid of nuclear weapons. The right wants America to have the best nuclear weapons. The right trusts American might more than universal disarmament.

 

The left wants to redefine marriage to include same-sex couples for the first time in history. The right wants gays to have equal rights, but to keep marriage defined as man-woman. This, too, constitutes an irreconcilable divide.

 

For these and other reasons, calls for a unity among Americans that transcends left and right are either naive or disingenuous. America will be united only when one of them prevails over the other. The left knows this. Most on the right do not.

Posted: 12/23/2008 - 2 comment(s) [ Comment ] - 0 trackback(s) [ Trackback ]
Category: The Family

The Family:The Greatest Fortress Of Human Liberty.

"The greatest fortress of human liberty, proof against all earthly
powers, is the Family. In it's small private space, it can defy the
will of authority and the might of wealth.

It is without doubt the most effective means of passing lore, culture,
manners and traditions down through the generations. Its loyalties
are stronger than those of the state, more powerful even than patriotism.

All serious tyrannies have sought to undermine or infiltrate it, socialist
tyrannies most of all. (eg. the former U.S.S.R.) ...The huge, wedge-shaped
Place of Weddings in Kiev was known locally as 'The Bermuda Triangle'
because so many of the marriages solemnized there later disappeared
without a trace. Divorce was deliberately made as easy as possible, while
abortion was an out-patient treatment, so trivial and cheap that many women
had seven or more abortions in a lifetime. (in the former U.S.S.R.)

There are many explanations for authority's mistrust of the Family. The main
one is that it cannot control what goes on there, what ideas are taught, what
wealth is stored up, what loyalties are fostered.

Perhaps more galling for those who believe that government action solves all
problems, a fully functioning Family does not OWE the state anything much.
If it feeds itself, clothes and schools it's children and cares for it's old and ill,
it does not need to show the almost feudal fealty to government demanded
of the rest of us in an age where the authorities, rather than God...seem to
be in charge of everything and to require most of our money to pay for their
services....

Full Family independence would undermine the government's supposed right
to demand heavy taxation.

It would also leave people free to cling to individual ideas of conscience,
rather than the nationalized 'social' conscience which measures a citizen's
value by how much tax he is willing to pay.

The freer a society is, the more it leaves the Family alone..."

__From The Abolition Of Britain by Peter Hitchens pp.190-192

Marriage and the Family is the one and only barrier/obstacle to stop
the all powerful state from it's natural tendency to rule by tyranny.
Destroy marriage and the Family and soon you will have the all powerful
state at your door first for your money (heavy taxes) then to take away
your rights and freedoms under one pretense or another. This is true
because the break down of marriage and the Family creates huge social
problems and dilemmas that only an all powerful government can "fix."
And they need your tax dollars and some of your rights and freedoms in
order to "fix" the resulting social mess created by the breakdown of marriage
and the Family. (Which "fix" btw, only creates more and deeper social problems
and dilemmas that need more and more tax dollars to "fix.")

One could make this culture war a battle front to preserve the Christian/American
Family, draw the battle line there, and he would be at precisely the right spot. If
we win the Battle For The Family we will automatically win this culture war, and if
we lose the Battle For The Family then we'll lose this culture war no matter how
many other minor skirmishes and battles we win.

Btw, there is no reason to assume we will lose this culture war, and many reasons
to believe that we will eventually win it. Here is one reason right here: "...THEN
the end will come, when He hands over the kingdom to God the Father AFTER
He has destroyed ALL dominion, authority and power. For He must reign UNTIL
He has put ALL His enemies under His feet..." I Corinthians 15:24,25 (caps mine)

That Biblical text sounds like our side wins at some point on the time line, doesn't it !

"...Then the end will come..." That would be the end of time, right ?  It would seem so.

And if that is the correct interpretation of that phrase, then we have a pretty clear statement

from the Biblical text that the Lord will reign in history "...until He has put all His enemies under His feet..."

"...AFTER He has destroyed ALL dominion, authority and power..." (caps mine)

That's just another way of saying that our side wins this war at some point on the time line.

(That is a very encouraging verse of Scripture as we fight this culture war.)

The Lord Himself is the originator and designer of the Christian Family and some of us believe that

this vital institution will not be defeated in the Earth, but will be sustained and protected by

the Lord Himself, through mercy and grace, even in the darkest of political times.

Jack Hectormann

 

 

 

 


Share/Bookmark